The resources you need to bring your best case forward.
Sometimes you need a platform, and sometimes you need a partner. Litigation Advisor offers you both. Our authoritative legal research platform and experienced team of research & writing attorneys is your secret weapon to help you build winning legal arguments.
Litigation Pathfinder is your authoritative legal research platform that gives you the edge you need to bring your best case forward every time. Quickly research and develop your winning legal arguments with our rich collection of practice-tested legal issues and comprehensive primary law.
Litigation Insider is your trusted source for insights into emerging developments and market intelligence in the world of litigation – enabling you to see current legal trends and opportunities that will give you the edge you need to make informed decisions and grow your practice.
Fairness is what justice really is.
- Potter Stewart
Our Customers Say It Best
“I think LRC fills a very valuable role. There is no way that my firm, or most firms, could produce these projects for the same cost. I know that you thought that I was unusual in directing a client to LRC rather than capturing the work for my firm, but I believe that my professional responsibility is to obtain the best overall result for my client.”
“LRC definitely is more cost effective than hiring an additional associate.”
Alan L. Inglis
“The insurance company reversed their position 180 degrees after I sent your brief to them. They not only acknowledged coverage, but they offered both of my clients their full policy limits.”
“I’ve used LRC’s whole gamut of services—research, memo writing, brief drafting, etc. I’ve also used LRC on a number of appeals. Every time I’ve used LRC I’ve won the case.”
“...I am happy to say that I won my case and was greatly assisted by the use of your service. Access to relevant appellate cases made it possible for me to understand the court’s focus and perspective. I managed to concisely present the salient points of my argument with references to relevant case law and was unchallenged by the opposition council – who apparently didn't have your service or didn't expect such a proficient and knowledgeable opponent.”